An exploratory study of the cultural context of organisational climate and human resource practices
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The ‘climate’ construct has an important and long history in organisational science. This study explores a specific type of organisational climate, known as human resource ( HR ) climate, in the context of an organisation operating in T urkey. The competing values framework is used to interpret the findings regarding the nature of HR climate, and to compare and contrast HR climate with organisational climate. This study employs an exploratory qualitative research design in which several in‐depth interviews were conducted with HR managers/directors. The findings suggest that although some dimensions of HR climate show similarities with those of organisational climate, there are significant differences. In addition, several dimensions of the HR climate found in this study reflect cultural characteristics of T urkey, specifically collectivism and paternalism. This extends knowledge of the concept of HR climate and shows that the construct may have dimensions that are culturally specific (particular) rather than universal.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it