Bibliographic record
Abstract
Jeffrey C. Alexander (1947-) semble avoir succédé depuis quelques années à Talcott Parsons (1902-1979) au titre du sociologue américain le plus influent. Comme Parsons, son oeuvre s’est d’abord construite sur une réinterprétation critique des auteurs classiques. C’est en grande partie par le biais d’une étude des écrits durkheimiens conférant aux Formes élémentaires de la vie religieuse un statut particulier que les deux auteurs ont élaboré, chacun à leur manière, une théorie volontariste de l’action sociale et une théorie émergentiste de l’ordre social. Au-delà des différences de leurs interprétations fondées sur leurs manières d’identifier des étapes dans le développement de la pensée durkheimienne, leur similarité consiste à centrer leur attention sur sa théorie de la religion pour la rabattre à une théorie de l’action sociale.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.021 | 0.020 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".