MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1755976876 · doi:10.1149/1.1864372

A Novel Fabrication Technique for Producing Dense Li[Ni[sub x]Li[sub (1∕3–2x∕3)]Mn[sub (2∕3−x∕3)]]O[sub 2], 0≤x≤1∕2

2005· article· en· W1755976876 on OpenAlexaff
D. Aaron R. Barkhouse, J. R. Dahn

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of The Electrochemical Society · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in Battery Materials
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpinelSinteringMaterials scienceFabricationPhase (matter)ColumbiteParticle sizeOxideChemical engineeringParticle (ecology)MineralogyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)MetallurgyChemistryCeramic

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using a novel synthesis technique similar to the Columbite method, we have prepared materials from the series , , with high density and average particle size greatly in excess of , without the aid of a sintering agent. The structure of precursors, as a function of temperature and composition, was studied in detail. These materials phase-separate into mixed oxides at approximately for most compositions, but compositions with convert to single-phase spinel upon further heating. This allows for the production of a single-phase precursor with a homogeneous cation distribution and large particle size and density. By reacting these mixed-metal oxide spinel precursors with , we have prepared dense materials without heating over . These dense materials will allow production of electrodes for advanced -ion cells with greater volumetric energy density.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations49
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of The Electrochemical SocietySame topicAdvancements in Battery MaterialsFrench-language works237,207