Thinking in three dimensions: a web-based algorithm to aid the interpretation of tuberculin skin test results.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The tuberculin skin test (TST) is the most widely used test for detecting tuberculosis (TB) infection. Accurate interpretation of TST requires consideration of three dimensions-the size of the skin reaction, the positive predictive value (PPV) and risk of disease. METHODS: We developed a web-based algorithm incorporating epidemiological, medical and radiographic risk factors to help in the interpretation of positive TST results in adults (http://www.meakins.mcgill.ca/meakins/NEW TST Calculator/homeE.htm). We used summary estimates from published reviews on the prevalence of latent TB infection, the likelihood of false-positive TST and risk of active TB disease. RESULTS: The algorithm calculations show that the most important determinants of risk of active disease are the presence of medical and radiographic risk factors, while the size of the reaction is of modest importance. In persons who have received bacille Calmette-Guérin vaccination after infancy, the algorithm calculations show that the PPV will be low. In such persons, the risk of disease is predicted to be very low, unless there are medical or radiographic risk factors that increase the risk of reactivation. CONCLUSIONS: Our web-based algorithm can generate clinically useful estimates of the annual and cumulative lifetime risk of developing TB in adults with a positive TST.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".