MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1756823618 · doi:10.1109/vims.2001.924897

Intelligent monitoring system used to control asynchronous production systems

2002· article· en· W1756823618 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElevator Systems and Control
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProduction (economics)Asynchronous communicationComputer scienceControl (management)Production controlSupervisory controlProduction managerProduction system (computer science)Systems engineeringRisk analysis (engineering)Real-time computingEngineeringTelecommunicationsBusinessArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A large amount of information is required to effectively manage a flexible asynchronous production system, such as a car assembly plant in Oshawa, Ontario. Such system is highly influenced by human factors. An intelligent production monitoring system (IPMS) was developed specifically for this production system. IPMS is a medium for presenting a vast amount of relevant, real-time and historical production information to the car plant management staff. Together with the standard predictive online models it allows experienced supervisory staff to arrive at operational decisions during shifts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.204
Threshold uncertainty score0.962

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElevator Systems and ControlFrench-language works237,207