MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Access to Higher Education in Nigeria: The University of Calabar at a Glance

2011· article· en· W1756872962 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian social science · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAfrican Education and Politics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGovernment (linguistics)Higher educationPopulationPolitical scienceAccess to Higher EducationConscienceState (computer science)Economic growthHumanitiesSociologyDemographyLawArtEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The need for meaningful access to university education has recently become indisipensible in Nigeria as a result of population increase and volume of awareness of the role of the university education in the development of the individual and the nation at large. Admission policies of Nigerian universities of recent has been so dissatisfactory to Nigerian public as many applicants are subjected to rigorous texts and expenditures for non-existing spaces in the universities. This paper therefore, examined the University of Calabar in order to identify the factors that militate against candidates access to higher education. Five research hypotheses were tested at .05 level of significance. 200 respondents were used as the population for the study. 75 lecturers and 125 students were used. Findings revealed among others, that; Post UME screening is not favourable to most candidates seeking access to university education in Nigeria. That quota system policy of university admission is not favourable to non—indigenes of the state. Based on the findings few recommendations were proferred, among which is, that Nigerian government should formulate admission policies that would give every Nigerian candidate access to university education. Key words: Access; Higher Education; University; Calabar and Glance Resume: La necessite d'un acces significatif a l'enseignement universitaire est devenu recemment indisipensible au Nigeria en raison de la croissance demographique et la prise de conscience du role de la formation universitaire dans le developpement de l'individu et de la nation dans son ensemble.Les politiques d'admission des universites nigeriennes de ces dernieres annees ont ete si insatisfaisantes aux yeux du public nigerien que beucoup de candidats sont soumis a des textes rigoureux et devraient payer pour les espaces non-existants dans les universites.Cet article a donc examine l'Universite de Calabar dans le but d'identifier les facteurs qui militent contre l'acces des candidats a l'enseignement superieur. Cinq hypotheses de recherche ont ete testes a un niveau de signification de 0,05 degre. 200 repondants ont ete enquetes comme les sujets de l'etude, dont 75 professeurs et 125 etudiants. Les resultats ont revele, entre autres, que le post UME depistage n'est pas favorable a la plupart des candidats qui cherchent a acceder a l'enseignement universitaire au Nigeria. Cette politique du systeme de quotas d'admission a l'universite n'est pas favorable aux non-indigenes de l'etat. Sur la base des conclusions, quelques recommandations ont ete presentees, parmi lesquelles, on voit que le gouvernement nigerien devrait formuler des politiques d'admission qui donneraient acces a tous les candidats du Nigeria a l'enseignement universitaire. Mots-cles: Acces; Enseignement superieur; Universite; Coup d'oeuil sur Calabar

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.558
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it