Bibliographic record
Abstract
En écho aux mutations financières et techniques qui font du travail une réalité à la fois précaire et complexe, les écrits qui en rendent compte adoptent aujourd’hui des formes diffuses. Sa représentation textuelle est à l’origine de particularités narratives qui lui sont spécifiques et qui entretiennent un dialogue avec d’autres configurations génériques données. Cet article tente de transposer le constat dans un registre extralittéraire, c’est-à-dire qu’on réfléchira aux conditions et aux effets d’éventuels métissages médiatiques. Que se passe-t-il lorsque Martine Sonnet (Atelier 62, 2009) intègre la photographie et des procédés documentaires à son œuvre? Quelle poétique se dégage d’éléments électroniques (les Composants qui donnent son titre au roman de Thierry Beinstingel, 2002), le jour où un narrateur allumé les agence… en poème?
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.027 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".