MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Lenguaje, Literacidad y Mente: La Hipótesis de la Literacidad

2009· article· es· W1758543240 on OpenAlexaff
David R. Olson

Bibliographic record

VenuePsykhe (Santiago) · 2009
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLiteracy and Educational Practices
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La literacidad no solamente es importante como un medio para acceder a nueva informacion y como extension de la memoria. Se propone, en cambio, que la escritura es un medio para tomar conciencia de las propiedades implicitas del lenguaje. Esta toma de conciencia se expresa a traves de nuevos conceptos para referirse a lo que se dice, su significado, sus implicancias, los elementos que lo componen y otros aspectos similares. La escritura logra este efecto al distanciar los pensamientos del escritor de la forma fija y objetiva que adquieren al ser escritos. De manera equivalente, el lector vive un proceso de distanciamiento similar al del escritor, con el efecto que leer se parece menos a escuchar directamente a un hablante que a escucharlo sin que este se de cuenta. Describo estos efectos senalando que la escritura pone al lenguaje entre comillas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.012
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.398
Teacher spread0.387 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePsykhe (Santiago)Same topicLiteracy and Educational PracticesFrench-language works237,207