MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1758603190 · doi:10.1136/bcr-2015-211200

Collagenous enterocolitis manifesting as watery diarrhoea and iron-deficiency anaemia

2015· article· en· W1758603190 on OpenAlexaff
Alan Hoi Lun Yau, Wei Xiong, Hin Hin Ko

Bibliographic record

VenueBMJ Case Reports · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMicroscopic Colitis
Canadian institutionsSt. Paul's HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGastroenterologyInternal medicineTransferrin saturationBloatingEpigastric painBiopsyAbdominal painGastrointestinal disorderIron deficiencyPathologyAnemiaVomiting

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 56-year-old Caucasian woman presented with epigastric pain, watery diarrhoea, bloating and flatulence following treatment with duloxetine and venlafaxine for anxiety and depression. Abdominal examination was benign. Blood work revealed haemoglobin of 96 g/L (115-160 g/L), iron 6 μmol/L (10-33 μmol/L), transferrin saturation 0.08 (0.20-0.55), ferritin 26 μg/L (15-180 μg/L), albumin 46 g/L (35-50 g/L), pre-albumin 293 mg/L (170-370 mg/L), total IgA 2.64 g/L (0.78-3.58 g/L) and anti-tTG IgA 5 units (<20 units). Faecal occult blood tests were 3/3 positive and stool cultures were negative. CT enterography was normal. Colonic biopsy revealed collagenous colitis, while duodenal biopsy showed collagenous sprue with blunted to completely flattened villi and markedly thickened subepithelial collagen table entrapping capillaries and lymphocytes. The patient started a gluten-free diet, loperamide and ferrous gluconate. Her symptoms resolved and a faecal immunochemical test performed 6 months later was negative.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMJ Case ReportsSame topicMicroscopic ColitisFrench-language works237,207