MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1758720676 · doi:10.3968/7209

The Enlightenment of the Ideas of China Modern Language Education in a Century

2015· article· en· W1758720676 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ruixue Liu, Xiaoyu Dong

Bibliographic record

VenueHigher education of social science · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEducational Reforms and Innovations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLEAPSEnlightenmentChinaChinese languageSubject (documents)CurriculumMathematics educationModern languageLanguage educationSociologyPedagogyLinguisticsPolitical scienceEpistemologyComputer sciencePsychologyLawPhilosophyLibrary science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 1903, Chinese language was officially established as an independent educational subject in China. In 2012, “The Chinese Language and Other Curriculum Standards of the Compulsory Education (2011 Edition)” was formally implemented. From 1903 to 2012, the modern language education had already had about a hundred years. In the history of a century, the educational ideas of Chinese language have had great progress in twists and turns, become prosperous through learning from others, and achieve leaps in debates. Understanding the development of the hundred years will allow us to take the history as a reference and achieve greater success in the future development of the modern language education.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.843
Threshold uncertainty score0.260

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHigher education of social scienceSame topicEducational Reforms and InnovationsFrench-language works237,207