The Canadian Asthma Primary Prevention Study: Outcomes at 2 Years of Age
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Becker A, Watson W, Ferguson A, Dimich-Ward H, Chan-Yeung M. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004;113:650–656To determine the effectiveness of a multifaceted intervention program in the primary prevention of asthma in high-risk infants.Subjects were children (n = 549) born between October 1994 and August 1996, classified as high-risk for development of asthma on the basis of family history.A prospective, controlled clinical trial identified mothers in their third trimester of pregnancy and randomized each mother into either the multifaceted-intervention group (n = 278) or control group (n = 267). The intervention program was implemented during the first year of life and included decreasing allergen (dust mite and pet) and environmental tobacco-smoke exposure, encouraging breastfeeding, and delaying introduction of solid foods. The control group did not receive specific intervention education. Home visits conducted during the third trimester, at 2 weeks, and at 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24 months of age assessed health, demographic, and home characteristics, and dust samples were collected to quantify house dust-mite and cat-allergen levels. Infants in each group were evaluated and prick skin-tested for common food and environmental allergens at 12 months and 2 years of age. Study participants were assessed for possible asthma, probable asthma, recurrent wheeze, recurrent cough, rhinitis without colds, and atopy (defined as positive skin test to ≥1 allergen).In terms of intervention efficacy, there were significant differences in cat-allergen exposure (with no change in prevalence of pets) and day care enrollment between the groups. Asthma was characterized as the sum of possible and probable asthma diagnoses. At 2 years, 40 of 246 (16.3%) intervention children and 53 of 230 (23%) control children were classified as asthmatic. There was a significant reduction in persistent asthma (children meeting criteria for asthma at both 12 and 24 months of age), with only 4.9% of the intervention group versus 11.3% of the control group characterized as having persistent asthma. There was no difference between the groups in regard to recurrent cough and no difference in incidence in the first year of life of recurrent wheeze. However, at 2 years, there were significantly fewer children in the intervention group with recurrent wheeze (1%) versus the control group (3.5%). The prevalence of atopy at 2 years was not different between the intervention (15.6%) and control (13.7%) groups.The multifaceted intervention program, which focused on decreasing exposure in the first year of life to aeroallergens, food allergens, and environmental tobacco smoke for children deemed to be at high risk for development of asthma, was successful in significantly reducing the incidence of asthma at 2 years of age.This study demonstrates that, in infants at high risk for developing asthma, reduction in allergen exposure and environmental modifications in the first year of life can significantly affect disease development and progression. Public health programs targeting these interventions may greatly impact the increasing prevalence and morbidity of childhood asthma.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".