Numerical analysis of jet and submerged hydraulic jump using moving particle semi-implicit method
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mesh-free particle (Lagrangian) methods have been used in a wide variety of applications in fluids studies in recent decades. A big advantage of these methods is the ability to model the deformations and spray generation in boundaries and interfaces, which are common problems with jets and jumps and may be difficult using Eulerian methods. Weakly compressible moving particle semi-implicit method (WC-MPS) has been developed and is used in this paper. The model is first validated for jet simulation and then applied to submerged hydraulic jumps. The flow regime, velocity distribution, and turbulence shear stresses at different distances from the jet inlet are investigated and compared with the analytical solution and experimental data. With this method, the inlet flow particles entering the domain can be tracked, as well as the development of vortices and recirculation in the corresponding turbulent flow fields. The comparison of MPS results with experimental data for submerged hydraulic jumps shows the using of WC-MPS reveals the flow characteristics especially in the critical circulating transition region of the jump.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it