MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1759334891 · doi:10.22347/2175-2753v7i19.781

Efeitos da Avaliação Externa das Aprendizagens no Desenvolvimento Profissional de Professores de Matemática do Ensino Básico em Portugal

2015· article· pt· W1759334891 on OpenAlex
Maria Micaela Marques, Joana Sousa, Natália Costa, José Augusto Pacheco

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Meta Avaliação · 2015
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation Pedagogy and Practices
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
FundersFundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neste artigo são apresentados resultados de um estudo empírico sobre os efeitos da realização de provas externas nacionais de matemática do 2º e 3º ciclos do ensino básico, no desenvolvimento profissional docente. Estas provas são um fator de legitimação de práticas ancoradas na abordagem do currículo centrada em testes e standards. Através duma metodologia quantitativa, verifica-se pelos dados dos respondentes (n=179) que professores de matemática revelam a tendência de apropriação específica da linguagem de valorização da avaliação externa de aprendizagens ao nível das suas práticas curriculares e pedagógicas, bem como a sua adesão à avaliação externa das aprendizagens, concretizada através da realização das provas finais de ciclo na disciplina de matemática, cujos efeitos mais evidentes são a valorização dos resultados académicos e a seriação das escolas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.326
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.218
GPT teacher head0.451
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it