MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1759498629 · doi:10.1002/kin.20918

Transient Chemical Oscillations in the 4‐(<i>N</i>,<i>N</i>‐Dimethylamino) Benzoic Acid–Bromate Reaction

2015· article· en· W1759498629 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Chemical Kinetics · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBromateChemistryBenzoic acidReagentInduction periodBromideBromineInorganic chemistryCatalysisRedoxPotassium bromatePhotochemistryBriggs–Rauscher reactionMedicinal chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT The bromination and oxidation of 4‐( N , N ‐dimethylamino) benzoic acid (DMABA) by acidic bromate was investigated in a batch reactor through following their redox potential and UV/vis absorption spectra, in which transient oscillations with a long induction time were observed. Different from most of the bromate‐aromatic compound oscillators reported earlier, the addition of metal catalysts such as manganese, cerium, and ferroin does not significantly affect the nonlinear phenomena, but the induction time could be greatly shortened by adding bromide ions as a starting reagent. The reaction between bromine and DMABA was identified through 1 H NMR spectroscopy to form 3‐bromo‐4‐( N , N ‐dimethylamino) benzoic acid. The compound 3‐bromo‐DMABA was also found to occur relatively early during the bromate‐DMABA reaction and was determined to be a major component prior to the onset of oscillations. Periodic evolution of 3‐bromo‐4‐( N , N ‐dimethylamino) benzoic acid has been detected with a UV/vis spectrophotometer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.233
Threshold uncertainty score0.323

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it