MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1760203973 · doi:10.5942/jawwa.2015.107.0180

Full‐Scale Prechlorine Removal: Impact on Filter Performance and Water Quality

2015· article· en· W1760203973 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Amina K. Stoddart, Graham A. Gagnon

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Water Works Association · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Treatment and Disinfection
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTurbidityFiltration (mathematics)EffluentFilter (signal processing)Water treatmentSand filterChemistryBiofilterBackwashingEnvironmental scienceWater qualityPulp and paper industryHaloacetic acidsSlow sand filterHydraulic headFilter pressEnvironmental engineeringWastewaterMathematicsInlet

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Conversion from direct filtration to biofiltration in a full‐scale drinking water treatment plant in Halifax, N.S., was assessed in terms of filter performance (e.g., turbidity, head loss) and water quality during a 48‐month project. Conversion was achieved by removing prechlorination, with the overall objective of reducing disinfection by‐product formation. As a result of prechlorine removal, it was hypothesized that the anthracite‐sand filters would provide both particle removal and biological treatment in a single process step. When prechlorine was removed, adenosine triphosphate concentrations on the filter media increased from ∼50 to ∼200–500 ng/cm3. Filter performance analysis revealed that conversion increased the filter effluent turbidity and reduced the filter head loss accumulation rate. Unit filter run volumes and filter run times were maintained. Water quality monitoring indicated that finished water total disinfection by‐products were reduced by ∼10–20 μg/L for trihalomethanes and ∼6–10 μg/L for haloacetic acids.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.077

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations41
Published2015
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Water Works AssociationSame topicWater Treatment and DisinfectionFrench-language works237,207