MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1760802502 · doi:10.1086/338239

An Atlas of<i>Far Ultraviolet Spectroscopic Explorer</i>Sight Lines toward the Magellanic Clouds

2002· article· en· W1760802502 on OpenAlexaff
Charles Danforth, J. Christopher Howk, A. W. Fullerton, William P. Blair, Kenneth R. Sembach

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsFar ultravioletAstronomyIonizationHaloLarge Magellanic CloudInterstellar mediumGalaxyInterstellar cloudAtlas (anatomy)UltravioletSpectral lineIonGeologyOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present an atlas of 57 Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) and 37 Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC) observations obtained with the Far Ultraviolet Spectroscopic Explorer ( FUSE ) satellite. The atlas highlights 12 interstellar absorption-line transitions at a resolution of ∼15 km s -1 . These transitions cover a broad range of temperatures, ionization states, and abundances. The species included are O VI, which probes hot ( T ∼ 3 × 10 5 K) ionized gas; C III and Fe III, which probe warm ( T ∼ 10 4 K) ionized gas; Si II, P II, C II, Fe II, and O I, which probe warm neutral gas; and six different molecular hydrogen transitions, which trace cold ( T ≤ 500 K) gas. We include Schmidt Hα CCD images of the region surrounding each sight line showing the morphology of warm ionized gas in the vicinity, along with continuum images near each FUSE aperture position. We present several initial scientific results derived from this dataset on the interstellar medium of the Magellanic Clouds and Galactic halo. O VI absorption at Magellanic Cloud velocities appears along nearly all sight lines, regardless of optical emission-line morphology. The velocity field of LMC disk material is probed using P II λ1152.8 absorption and is seen to be consistent with recent H I results. While the velocity structure of the SMC is complex, two absorption features are clearly separated in the SMC data—a strong absorption complex between +100 and +130 km s -1 , and a weaker feature near +180 km s -1 . The velocity separation between these complexes varies with position, being greater on average in the southwest portion of the SMC. A lower velocity absorption component seen the nine sight lines toward the bright H II region N66 in the SMC may be the result of an outflow or an old SNR within this nebular complex. Absorption in Fe II and O I at ∼+60 km s -1 and ∼+120 km s -1 appear along many LMC sight lines. They are attributed, respectively, to an intermediate-velocity cloud and a high-velocity cloud in the Milky Way halo. Both features are dramatically stronger toward the eastern half of the LMC and are not correlated with each other or with LMC Hα morphology. The lower velocity of the SMC and broader absorption lines complicate the detection of intermediate and high velocity Galactic absorption along SMC sight lines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations61
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical Journal Supplement SeriesSame topicAstrophysics and Star Formation StudiesFrench-language works237,207