MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1760864867 · doi:10.4000/books.pufr.662

Définir les loisirs publics en milieu urbain ; un enjeu moral et identitaire (Montréal et Toronto 1900-1940)

2005· book-chapter· fr· W1760864867 on OpenAlexaffabout
Michèle Dagenais

Bibliographic record

VenuePresses universitaires François-Rabelais eBooks · 2005
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicNight-time city culture
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Si très tôt dans leur histoire, les loisirs sont célébrés pour leur vertu régénératrice et récréative, leur définition, les moments pour s’y adonner, leur contenu et les manières de jouer donnent lieu à d’intenses débats. À partir du moment où l’accès aux loisirs s’élargit et se démocratise, se récréer devient un enjeu social et culturel central, ce qui donne lieu au développement d’un ensemble de discours et à l’élaboration de normes destinées à encadrer cette nouvelle réalité, en particulie...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.930
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePresses universitaires François-Rabelais eBooksSame topicNight-time city cultureFrench-language works237,207