MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1761560465 · doi:10.7202/1032148ar

Influence des facteurs environnementaux et démographiques dans la cooccurrence de la diarrhée et de la fièvre chez les enfants dans cinq quartiers périphériques de Ouagadougou (Burkina Faso)

2015· article· fr· W1761560465 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Franklin Bouba Djourdebbé, Stéphanie Dos Santos, Thomas Legrand, Abdramane Soura

Bibliographic record

VenueCahiers québécois de démographie · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldNursing
TopicChild Nutrition and Water Access
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La cooccurrence des symptômes est un problème de santé publique dans plusieurs pays en développement. Faute de données appropriées, on dispose de très peu de preuves entre cooccurrence des symptômes, environnement et facteurs démographiques. Dans cet article, on recourt aux données sur cinq quartiers de l’Observatoire de population de Ouagadougou pour examiner l’influence des facteurs environnementaux et démographiques dans la cooccurrence de la diarrhée et de la fièvre. Les analyses multivariées basées sur des modèles logit ordonnés montrent que les effets de l’environnement et des facteurs démographiques sont plus importants sur la diarrhée ou la fièvre simple que sur la diarrhée et la fièvre combinées. Les analyses révèlent également que l’insalubrité du ménage, la nature du sol extérieur et l’âge de l’enfant sont des facteurs importants de cooccurrence de la diarrhée et de la fièvre chez les enfants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.448
Threshold uncertainty score0.891

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCahiers québécois de démographie→Same topicChild Nutrition and Water Access→French-language works237,207→