MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1761898663 · doi:10.22230/src.2010v1n1a5

The OMMM Project: Toward a Collaborative Editorial Workflow

2009· article· en· W1761898663 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
John W. Maxwell

Bibliographic record

VenueScholarly and Research Communication · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDigital Games and Media
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPublishingVariety (cybernetics)WorkflowAdaptation (eye)Library scienceWorld Wide WebPolitical scienceSociologyMedia studiesComputer sciencePsychologyDatabase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The BC Association of Magazine Publishers and Simon Fraser University's Canadian Centre for Studies in Publishing are working on an adaptation of Open Journal Systems (OJS) for publishers of small cultural magazines, a community of users with needs that are very different in a wide variety of ways from the standard groups OJS has traditionally served in scholarly publishing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.149
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.205
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.959
Threshold uncertainty score0.789

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1490.205
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.004
Bibliometrics0.0200.014
Science and technology studies0.0140.007
Scholarly communication0.0410.029
Open science0.0100.030
Research integrity0.0080.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.029

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.429
Teacher spread0.352 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScholarly and Research CommunicationSame topicDigital Games and MediaFrench-language works237,207