MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1762271469 · doi:10.1109/iscas.2001.921078

Packet loss in video transfers over IP networks

2002· article· en· W1762271469 on OpenAlexaff
Fei Xue, Velibor Markovski, Ljiljana Trajković

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Traffic and Congestion Control
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPacket lossComputer networkComputer scienceTransmission delayUser Datagram ProtocolTransmission Control ProtocolDatagramInternet ProtocolPacket analyzerRadio Link ProtocolInternet protocol suiteEnd-to-end delayNetwork packetTCP VegasTCP global synchronizationReal-time computingThe InternetWirelessTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we investigate the behavior of packet loss in Internet Protocol (IP) networks with two transport protocols: User Datagram Protocol (UDP) and Transmission Control Protocol (TCP). We simulate packet loss in congested networks, and we use wavelet analysis to characterize packet loss collected from the trace driven simulation studies. We also analyze the impact of time-scales on the characterization and modeling of loss processes. Our analysis reveals that the packet loss behavior depends on the underlying transport protocol and that the packet loss in UDP transfers exhibits long-range dependence over the coarser time-scales. Furthermore, we show that packet loss patterns preserve the long-range characteristics of the traffic traces generated by the video sources.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNetwork Traffic and Congestion ControlFrench-language works237,207