MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1762375712 · doi:10.3968/4845

The Software Reliability Increase Method

2014· article· en· W1762375712 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Svetlana A. Yaremchuk, Dmitry Maevsky

Bibliographic record

VenueStudies in sociology of science · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware Engineering Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReliability engineeringCode refactoringReliability (semiconductor)Computer scienceStatisticSoftware qualitySoftware reliability testingSoftwareSoftware metricProcess (computing)Probabilistic logicStatisticsSoftware developmentProgramming languageMathematicsArtificial intelligenceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Our investigation purpose is to create the software reliability increase method. The proposed method allows creators to calculate statistic, probabilistic and valuating reliability indices of software components which contain defects. The method’s aim is to take into consideration the statistic components complexity by means of composite metrics. The use of received indices provides for components finding which contain much more defects for refactoring and the first testing process. It contributes to increase identified and corrected defects quantity and improve the software reliability on average about 8%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.049
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.176
Threshold uncertainty score0.973

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.049
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.030
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.388
Teacher spread0.350 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudies in sociology of scienceSame topicSoftware Engineering ResearchFrench-language works237,207