MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1762801926 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2005.1557276

Photoinduced dichroism in thin films of amorphous As/sub 2/Se/sub 3/

2006· article· en· W1762801926 on OpenAlexaff
Daniel DeForrest, Robert E. Johanson, Safa Kasap

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPhase-change materials and chalcogenides
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDichroismPolarizerLinear dichroismMaterials scienceOpticsAmorphous solidDichroic glassAnisotropyCircular dichroismPolarization (electrochemistry)Magnetic circular dichroismMolecular physicsOptoelectronicsBirefringenceChemistryPhysicsCrystallographySpectral line

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have measured the dichroism in amorphous As/sub 2/Se/sub 3/ induced by a polarized beam of near band-gap light (632.8 nm). Most glassy material is initially isotropic and homogeneous. When As/sub 2/Se/sub 3/ absorbs an intense pump-beam of polarized light, the absorption coefficient for light polarized in the same direction as the pump-beam is less than for the perpendicular polarization, i.e. the sample becomes anisotropic (dichroic). Induced dichroism is potentially useful in various photonic devices including optical switches, optical memory, and polarizers. In our experiments, the total induced dichroism amounts to 0.24% after 10 minutes of illumination by polarized laser light (632.8 nm) with an intensity of 130 mW/cm/sup 2/. The induced dichroism is reversible by rotating the polarization of the pump light by 90/spl deg/. A total change of 0.48% is achieved between the two orthogonal states. We find that the time dependence of the induced dichroism fits a stretched exponential function.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPhase-change materials and chalcogenidesFrench-language works237,207