MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Partitioning of [methyl‐3H]methionine to methylated products under normal and high demand conditions in young Yucatan miniature pigs

2010· article· en· W176330465 on OpenAlexaff
Laura E. McBreairty, Simon G. Lamarre, Ross McGowan, Robert F. Bertolo

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMetabolism and Genetic Disorders
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCreatineMethionineSarcosineChemistryCholineMethylationBiochemistryMethyl groupMetabolismDNA synthesisInternal medicineEndocrinologyDNABiologyAmino acidOrganic chemistryMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Methionine is the main source of 1‐carbon molecules which are partitioned to synthesize various methylated products including creatine, phosphatidylcholine, sarcosine and methylated DNA. Guanidinoacetate (GAA) is methylated to form creatine and because hepatic creatine synthesis in rats appears to be proportional to GAA availability, we hypothesized that when GAA is in excess, increased creatine synthesis will create a higher demand for available methyl groups. The objective of this study was to characterize the partitioning of the methyl groups of methionine with or without excess GAA. Anaesthetized piglets (15–18 d old) were intraportally infused with either GAA (n=5) or saline (n=5) for 2 h. A bolus of [methyl‐ 3 H]methionine was intraportally infused at 1 h and liver samples were excised by cautery 30, 45 and 60 min later. Various methylated metabolites in the liver were analyzed for specific activity. As hypothesized, excess GAA led to increased creatine synthesis, resulting in a ~200% increase in methyl‐ 3 H incorporation (P<0.05). We further hypothesized that this increased creatine synthesis would attenuate methyl‐ 3 H incorporation into other products. However, incorporation into DNA was ~240% greater with GAA (P<0.05). In neonatal piglets, creatine synthesis is increased by excess GAA availability but instead of sequestering available methyl groups, this led to increased methylation of DNA. (CIHR)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicMetabolism and Genetic Disorders→French-language works237,207→