MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W176350038

Physics of the double pulsar

2006· article· en· W176350038 on OpenAlexaff
Roman R. Rafikov

Bibliographic record

Venue36th COSPAR Scientific Assembly · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPulsarPhysicsMillisecond pulsarMagnetosphereBinary pulsarNeutron starAstrophysicsAstronomyX-ray pulsarPulsar planetPlasmaNuclear physics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pulsar J0737-3039 is the only currently known double neutron star system in which both components exhibit themselves as radio pulsars. A number of peculiar properties very compact orbit (with period 2.4 hours), almost edge-on orientation of the orbital plane with respect to our line of sight provide us with unprecedented opportunities of checking effects of general relativity and probing the physics of pulsar magnetospheres. This report will provide a brief overview of our current understanding of some of the unique phenomena that have been observed in the double pulsar system: accumulation of relativistic plasma in the magnetosphere of normal pulsar causes periodic eclipses of its millisecond companion. Powerful wind of the millisecond pulsar distorts the magnetosphere of its normal companion, which affects the spindown and emission properties of normal pulsar. Future observational and theoretical work on this system may turn it into a Rosetta Stone of pulsar physics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue36th COSPAR Scientific AssemblySame topicPulsars and Gravitational Waves ResearchFrench-language works237,207