MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W176438667

Проблема авторитета в отношениях власти и подданных в России в последней четверти XVII В. (на примере греко-латинской полемики «о пресуществлении святых даров»)

2013· article· ru· W176438667 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueВестник Томского государственного университета. История · 2013
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLinguistics and language evolution
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIdeologyPolitical scienceLawPoliticsQuarter (Canadian coin)SociologyHistory
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article is devoted to the features of ideological and political conflicts associated with the problem of authority in the relations between the authorities and the citizens in the Russian society in the last quarter of the XVII century. On the example of Greek-Latin controversy of transubstantiation the author of the article explores the influence of the positions taken by the leaders of the Latinphiles and Greek-philes (Sylvester Medvedev and patriarch Joachim) on submission to a higher authority, on the course and outcome of the ideological confrontation between the two factions of the court.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.450
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.005
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.003
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.004
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1040.042

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it