Стоянка Корепино i первый энеолитический памятник на Р. Колве в Северном Прикамье
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The materials on the Eneolithic Age of Northern Prikamye are published for the first time. The site Korepino I on the river Kolva represents two cultural chronological stages of the Eneolithic Age Novoilinskiy time horizon, the late stage of Gari culture (end of III thousand BC). Novoilinskiy ceramic complex found at the site is considered to be the most northern in the Middle Trans-Urals at the moment. The nearest monuments of this cultural heritage are located to the south the site Chashkinskoe Lake I, Chanvenskaya Cave. Novoilinskiy type monuments should be traced back to the second quarter of the IVth first half of the IIIrd thousand BC based on a series of radiocarbon dating. According to V. S. Stokolos, Eneolothic Age monuments of Chuzhyayolskaya culture of northern Trans-Urals belong to the same time period. The materials from a Novoilinskiy site Korepino I show that the monuments of this cultural heritage are widespread along the river basin Kama that led the authors to conclude on the formation of the monuments of flag-type chronological period on this vast territory. The main complex associated with a one-room house is Pozdnegarinskiy. The peculiarities of the vessels, which were especially known for the Gand T-shaped whisks, denticulated patterns on the vessels and the absence of «walking» points in the patterns add to the evidences. One-room houses are quite typical for Pozdnegarinskiy period. On the whole, Pozdnegarinskiy complex of the site Korepino I is the closest to the materials of the settlements Novo-Ilinskoe I, Zaboynoe I, Kama-Zhulanskoe. Garinskiy complex of the site Korepino I has the common features with the materials of Choynovtinskiy culture of the rivers basins Northern Dvina and Vychegda.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.034 | 0.014 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".