MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1764887750 · doi:10.1109/pacrim.1995.519549

Design of 2-D linear phase IIR filters by using all-pass building blocks

2002· article· en· W1764887750 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDigital Filter Design and Implementation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPassbandLinear phase2D FiltersCascadeInfinite impulse responsePrototype filterControl theory (sociology)Network synthesis filtersTransfer functionSensitivity (control systems)AlgorithmBand-pass filterComputer scienceMathematicsFilter (signal processing)Group delay and phase delayExtension (predicate logic)Low-pass filterDigital filterElectronic engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Complementary filters are driven by using two 1-D all-pass functions. A structure of this kind employs a low sensitivity property. This structure is also computationally efficient. An extension of the 1-D structure to the 2-D structure is presented. It consists of the cascade sum of two 2-D all-pass building blocks with appropriate delay elements. Filters with the various cut-off boundaries can be designed by changing the parameters of the proposed structure. These parameters can be adapted from the table given. The coefficients of the all-pass blocks are obtained via an iterative nonlinear optimization technique. The objective function of the optimization program consists of the magnitude and the group delay error functions, resulting in a fairly linear phase filter in the passband with a specified magnitude shape.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.778
Threshold uncertainty score0.436

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.119
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDigital Filter Design and ImplementationFrench-language works237,207