A novel form of presynaptic CaMKII-dependent short-term potentiation between Lymnaea neurons
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Short-term plasticity is thought to form the basis for working memory, the cellular mechanisms of which are the least understood in the nervous system. In this study, using in vitro reconstructed synapses between the identified Lymnaea neuron visceral dorsal 4 (VD4) and left pedal dorsal 1 (LPeD1), we demonstrate a novel form of short-term potentiation (STP) which is 'use'- but not time-dependent, unlike most previously defined forms of short-term synaptic plasticity. Using a triple-cell configuration we demonstrate for the first time that a single presynaptic neuron can reliably potentiate both inhibitory and excitatory synapses. We further demonstrate that, unlike previously described forms of STP, the synaptic potentiation between Lymnaea neurons does not involve postsynaptic receptor sensitization or presynaptic residual calcium. Finally, we provide evidence that STP at the VD4-LPeD1 synapse requires presynaptic calcium/calmodulin dependent kinase II (CaMKII). Taken together, our study identifies a novel form of STP which may provide the basis for both short- and long-term potentiation, in the absence of any protein synthesis-dependent steps, and involve CaMKII activity exclusively in the presynaptic cell.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".