Porcine recombinant factor <scp>VIII</scp> (Obizur; <scp>OBI</scp>‐1; <scp>BAX</scp>801): product characteristics and preclinical profile
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Acquired haemophilia A (AHA) is a rare, often severe, auto-immune bleeding disorder caused by the development of inhibitory antibodies (inhibitors) to factor VIII (FVIII). Bypassing agents, recombinant activated FVII or activated prothrombin complex concentrate, are currently recommended as first-line treatments to control bleeding events in patients with AHA. AIM: A plasma-derived porcine FVIII (Hyate:C, Ipsen, UK) was used as a first-line treatment for AHA but was discontinued in 2004 due to viral safety concerns. A recombinant pFVIII (rpFVIII), Obizur (OBI-1; BAX801), which is expected to have a similar efficacy profile to Hyate:C but with a superior safety profile was developed and recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of AHA. METHODS: Obizur manufacturing begins with the expression of B domain deleted rpFVIII by genetically modified baby hamster kidney-derived cells. The final purified and lyophilized drug product has a negligible risk of viral contamination and contains no animal-derived plasma proteins. Obizur was evaluated for immunogenicity, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and bleeding times in preclinical models including in haemophiliac dogs, cynomolgus monkeys and FVIII-knockout mice. RESULTS: Preclinical animal studies show that the efficacy and immunogenicity of Obizur are similar to that of Hyate:C and that Obizur has a more favourable safety profile. CONCLUSIONS: Obizur is a highly purified recombinant porcine FVIII drug product that has been demonstrated to have a favourable safety and efficacy profile when compared with Hyate:C and can be a valuable treatment option for control of bleeding in AHA patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".