MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1765671350

Analysis of human tone-burst-evoked otoacoustic emissions

2012· article· en· W1765671350 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Reinhart Frosch

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian acoustics · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBasilar membraneAcousticsResonatorSuperposition principleTone (literature)CochleaOrgan of CortiPhysicsAudiologyOpticsMedicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Human click-evoked otoacoustic emissions (OAE) were analyzed to agree with cochlear-map-based predictions. Four human cochlear maps, the passive-peak (PP) map, the (low-level) active-peak (AP) map, the basilar-membrane resonator (BMR) map, and the internal organ-of-Corti resonator (IOCR) map, are studied. The satellite peaks of an 80-dB tone burst have sound-pressure levels (SPLs) of 49dB, 39dB, and are therefore strongly amplified by the OHCs in their IOCR resonance regions. A part of the mechanical energy generated by these OHCs is transported back to the cochlear base by a reverse TW and thus causes OAEs. The large-delay beats in the 2- and 4-kHz parts are consistent with being due to the superposition of two SOAEs. The tone-burst-evoked OAEs, in spite of differing appreciably from the click-evoked OAEs of Frosch, are found to be compatible with predictions based on the human cochlear maps.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian acousticsSame topicHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, GeneticsFrench-language works237,207