MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1765851492 · doi:10.1103/physrevc.78.045209

Electroexcitation of the Roper resonance for<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>4.5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.3em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GeV</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math>in<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>→</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mover><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">en</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>π</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math>

2008· article· lv· W1765851492 on OpenAlexaff
I. G. Aznauryan, V. D. Burkert, W. Kim, K. Park, G. S. Adams, M. J. Amaryan, P. Ambrozewicz, M. Anghinolfi, G. Asryan, H. Avakian, H. Bagdasaryan, N. Baillie, J. Ball, N. A. Baltzell, S. Barrow, V. Batourine, M. Battaglieri, I. Bedlinskiy, M. Bektasoglu, M. Bellis, N. Benmouna, B.L. Berman, A. S. Biselli, L. Blaszczyk, B. E. Bonner, C. Bookwalter, S. Bouchigny, S. Boiarinov, R. Bradford, D. Branford, W. J. Briscoe, W. K. Brooks, S. Bültmann, C. Butuceanu, J. R. Calarco, S. L. Careccia, D. S. Carman, L. Casey, A. Cazes, S. Chen, Liang Cheng, P. L. Cole, P. Collins, P. Coltharp, D. Cords, P. Corvisiero, Donald G. Crabb, V. Credé, J. P. Cummings, D. Dale, N. Dashyan, R. De Masi, R. De Vita, M. C. De Sanctis, P. V. Degtyarenko, H. Denizli, L. Dennis, A. Deur, S. Dhamija, K. V. Dharmawardane, K. S. Dhuga, R. Dickson, C. Djalali, G. E. Dodge, J. Donnelly, D. Doughty, M. Dugger, S. Dytman, O. P. Dzyubak, H. Egiyan, K. S. Egiyan, L. El Fassi, L. Elouadrhiri, P. Eugenio, G. Fedotov, G. Feldman, R. J. Feuerbach, T. A. Forest, A. Fradi, H. O. Funsten, M. Gabrielyan, M. Garçon, G. Gavalian, N. Gevorgyan, G. P. Gilfoyle, K. L. Giovanetti, F. X. Girod, J. T. Goetz, W. Gohn, E. Golovatch, A. Gönenç, C. I. O. Gordon, R. W. Gothe, L. Graham, K. A. Griffioen, M. Guidal, M. Guillo, N. Guler, L. Guo, V. Gyurjyan, C. Hadjidakis, K. Hafidi, K. Hafnaoui, H. Hakobyan, R. S. Hakobyan, C. Hanretty, J. Hardie, N. Hassall, D. Heddle, F. W. Hersman, K. Hicks, I. Hleiqawi, M. Holtrop, C. E. Hyde-Wright, Y. Ilieva, D. G. Ireland, Б. С. Ишханов, E. L. Isupov, M. M. Ito, D. Jenkins, H. S. Jo, J. R. Johnstone, K. Joo, H. G. Juengst, N. Kalantarians, D. Keller, J. D. Kellie, M. Khandaker, K. Y. Kim, A. Klein, Frank Klein, A. V. Klimenko, M. Kossov, Z. Krahn, L. H. Kramer, V. Kubarovsky, J. Kühn, S. E. Kuhn, S. Kuleshov, V. Kuznetsov, J. Lachniet, J. M. Laget, J. Langheinrich, David Lawrence, T. Lee, Ji Li, A. C. S. Lima, K. Livingston, H. Y. Lu, K. Lukashin, M. MacCormick, N. Markov, P. Mattione, S. McAleer, B. McKinnon, J. W. C. McNabb, B. A. Mecking, S. Mehrabyan, J. J. Melone, M. D. Mestayer, C. A. Meyer, T. Mibe, K. Mikhailov, R. Minehart, M. Mirazita, R. Miskimen, V. Mokeev, L. Morand, B. Moreno, K. Moriya, S. A. Morrow, M. Moteabbed, J. Mueller, E. Munévar, G. S. Mutchler, P. Nadel-Turoński, R. Nasseripour, S. Niccolai, G. Niculescu, I. Niculescu, B. B. Niczyporuk, M. R. Niroula, R. A. Niyazov, M. Nozar, G. V. O’Rielly, M. Osipenko, A. I. Ostrovidov, S. Park, E. Pasyuk, C. Paterson, S. Anefalos Pereira, S. A. Philips, J. Pierce, N. Pivnyuk, D. Počanić, O. Pogorelko, E. Polli, I. Popa, S. Pozdniakov, B. M. Preedom, J. W. Price, Y. Prok, D. Protopopescu, L. M. Qin, B. A. Raue, G. Riccardi, G. Ricco, M. Ripani, B. G. Ritchie, G. Rosner, P. Rossi, D. Rowntree, P. D. Rubin, F. Sabatié, M. S. Saini, J. Salamanca, C. Salgado, J. P. Santoro, V. Sapunenko, D. Schott, R. A. Schumacher, V. S. Serov, Y. G. Sharabian, D. Sharov, J. Shaw, N. V. Shvedunov, A. V. Skabelin, E. S. Smith, L. C. Smith, D. I. Sober, D. Sokhan, A. Stavinsky, S. Stepanyan, B. E. Stokes, P. Stoler, I. I. Strakovsky, S. Strauch, R. Suleiman, M. Taiuti, Tomonari Takeuchi, D. J. Tedeschi, A. Tkabladze, S. Tkachenko, L. Todor, C. Tur, M. Ungaro, M. F. Vineyard, A. V. Vlassov, D. P. Watts, L. B. Weinstein, D. P. Weygand, M. Williams, E. Wolin, M. H. Wood, A. Yegneswaran, Jaeseok Yun, M. Yurov, L. Zana, B. Zhang, Jiaoxia Zhang, B. Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review C · 2008
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
Canadian institutionsTRIUMF
FundersThomas Jefferson National Accelerator FacilityInstituto Nazionale di Fisica NucleareU.S. Department of EnergyScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNational Science Foundation
KeywordsHelicityPhysicsAmplitudeParticle physicsIsobarResonance (particle physics)Nuclear physicsAsymmetryNucleonOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The helicity amplitudes of the electroexcitation of the Roper resonance are extracted for $1.7<{Q}^{2}<4.5\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}{\mathrm{GeV}}^{2}$ from recent high precision JLab-CLAS cross section and longitudinally polarized beam asymmetry data for ${\ensuremath{\pi}}^{+}$ electroproduction on protons at $W=1.15\ensuremath{-}1.69$ GeV. The analysis is made using two approaches, dispersion relations and a unitary isobar model, which give consistent ${Q}^{2}$ behavior of the helicity amplitudes for the ${\ensuremath{\gamma}}^{*}p\ensuremath{\rightarrow}$N(1440)P${}_{11}$ transition. It is found that the transverse helicity amplitude ${A}_{1/2}$, which is large and negative at ${Q}^{2}=0$, becomes large and positive at ${Q}^{2}\ensuremath{\simeq}2\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}{\mathrm{GeV}}^{2}$, and then drops slowly with ${Q}^{2}$. The longitudinal helicity amplitude ${S}_{1/2}$, which was previously found from CLAS $\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{e}p\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\mathit{ep}{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{0},\mathit{en}{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{+}$ data to be large and positive at ${Q}^{2}=0.4,0.65\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}{\mathrm{GeV}}^{2}$, drops with ${Q}^{2}$. Available model predictions for ${\ensuremath{\gamma}}^{*}p\ensuremath{\rightarrow}$N(1440)P${}_{11}$ allow us to conclude that these results provide strong evidence in favor of N(1440)P${}_{11}$ as a first radial excitation of the $3q$ ground state. The results of the present paper also confirm the conclusion of our previous analysis for ${Q}^{2}<1$ GeV${}^{2}$ that the presentation of N(1440)P${}_{11}$ as a q$^{3}\mathrm{G}$ hybrid state is ruled out.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.122
Threshold uncertainty score0.408

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1220.021

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations76
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review CSame topicQuantum Chromodynamics and Particle InteractionsFrench-language works237,207