MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1766515772 · doi:10.3749/canmin.1400080

CHUBAROVITE, KZn<sub>2</sub>(BO<sub>3</sub>)Cl<sub>2</sub>, A NEW MINERAL SPECIES FROM THE TOLBACHIK VOLCANO, KAMCHATKA, RUSSIA

2015· article· en· W1766515772 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Igor V. Pekov, Natalia V. Zubkova, Leonid A. Pautov, Vasiliy O. Yapaskurt, Nikita V. Chukanov, Inna S. Lykova, Sergey N. Britvin, Evgeny G. Sidorov, D.Y. Pushcharovsky

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Mineralogist · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCrystal Structures and Properties
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCrystallographyScoriaChemistryOrthoclaseMohs scale of mineral hardnessMineralMineralogyHaliteMuscoviteMicaGeologyGeochemistryVolcanoVolcanic rock

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The new mineral chubarovite, KZn 2 (BO 3 )Cl 2 , was found in the sublimates of active fumaroles at the Second and First scoria cones of the Northern Breakthrough of the Great Tolbachik Fissure Eruption, Tolbachik volcano, Kamchatka, Russia. At the Second scoria cone it occurs in the Arsenatnaya fumarole (the holotype) with fluoborite, krasheninnikovite, sylvite, halite, langbeinite, aphthitalite, orthoclase, fluorophlogopite, hematite, and tenorite. At the First scoria cone, chubarovite is closely associated with sellaite, fluorite, anhydrite, halite, cotunnite, challacolloite, sofiite, and flinteite. Chubarovite forms hexagonal or trigonal lamellar to tabular crystals up to 1.5 mm across and up to 0.5 mm thick, with aggregates and crystal crusts up to 1 cm across. The major crystal form is {001}, and lateral faces are {101}, {102}, {103}, {100}, and {110}; twins of two types are observed. Chubarovite is transparent, colorless, with vitreous luster. It is flexible but not elastic. The Mohs hardness is ca . 2. Cleavage is (001) perfect, mica-like. D (meas.) is 2.68(2), D (calc.) is 2.716 g cm –3 . Chubarovite is optically uniaxial (–), with ω 1.541(2), e 1.539(2). The infrared spectrum is given. Chemical data (wt.%, determined by electron-microprobe, boron by ICP OES) are: K 2 O 16.48, Rb 2 O 0.46, ZnO 53.96, B 2 O 3 10.98, Cl 24.48, –O=Cl 2 –5.53, total 100.83. The empirical formula, based on 5 (O+Cl) apfu , is: (K 1.05 Rb 0.01 ) Σ 1.06 Zn 2.00 B 0.95 O 2.92 Cl 2.08 . Chubarovite is trigonal, R 32, a 4.9429(4), c 26.348(2) A, V 557.50(8) A 3 , and Z = 3. The strongest reflections of the powder X-ray diffraction pattern [ d ,A( I )( hkl )] are: 8.79(100)(003), 4.394(43)(006), 4.225(25)(101), 4.074(91)(012), 3.590(90)(104), 3.324(30)(015), 2.470(67)(110), and 2.245(25)(1.0.10). Chubarovite has a novel structure type. Its crystal structure, solved from single-crystal X-ray diffraction data ( R = 0.020), is composed of layers of two types with an alternation along [001]. The anionic {Zn 2 (BO 3 )Cl 2 } – layer consists of flat triangular BO 3 groups sharing all O vertices with bases of ZnO 3 Cl tetrahedra. Each Cl atom is shared between one Zn-centered tetrahedron and three edge-connected KCl 6 octahedra belonging to the cationic layer formed by K + cations. The mineral is named in honor of the Russian mineralogist and physicist Valeriy M. Chubarov (born 1948).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian MineralogistSame topicCrystal Structures and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207