MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W176676682 · doi:10.1007/3-540-31078-9_77

Larvae of marine invertebrates: Paleontological significance

2006· book-chapter· en· W176676682 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Thor A. Hansen, David Jablonski

Bibliographic record

VenueKluwer Academic Publishers eBooks · 2006
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMarine Biology and Environmental Chemistry
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMarine invertebratesLarvaInvertebrateBiologyZoologyFisheryEcologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hansen, T. A., 1978. Larval dispersal and species longevity in Lower Tertiary gastropods, Science, 199, 885–887. Google Scholar Jablonski, D., 1978. Late Cretaceous gastropod protoconchs (Abstr.), Geol Soc. Amer. Abstr., 10, 49. Google Scholar Kauffman, E. G., 1975. The value of benthic Bivalvia in Cretaceous biostratigraphy of the Western Interior, Geol. Assoc. Canada, Spec. Paper 13, 163–194. Google Scholar Knudsen, J., 1970. The systematics and biology of abyssal and hadal Bivalvia, Galathea Rept., 11, 1–241. Google Scholar LaBarbera, M., 1974. Larval and post-larval development of five species of Miocene bivalves (Mollusca), J. Paleontology, 48, 256–277. Google Scholar Lutz, R. A., and Jablonski, D., 1978. Cretaceous bivalve larvae, Science, 199, 439–440. Google Scholar Mileikovsky, S. A., 1971. Types of larval development in marine bottom invertebrates, their distribution and ecological significance: A reevaluation, Marine Biol., 10, 193–213. CrossRef Google Scholar Ockelmann, W. K., 1965. Developmental types in marine bivalves and their distribution along the Atlantic coast of Europe, Proc. 1st European Malacological Congr., 25–35. Google Scholar Scheltema, R. S., 1971a. The dispersal of the larvae of shoal-water benthic invertebrate species over long distances by ocean currents, in D. J. Crisp, ed., Fourth European Marine Biology Symposium. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 7–28. Google Scholar Scheltema, R. S., 1971b. Larval dispersal as a means of genetic exchange between geographically separated populations of shallow-water benthic marine gastropods. Biol. Bull., 140, 284–322. Google Scholar Scheltema, R. S., 1972. Reproduction and dispersal of bottom dwelling deep-sea invertebrates: A speculative summary, in R. W. Brauer, ed., Barobiology and the Experimental Biology of the Deep Sea. Chapel Hill: N. Carolina Sea Grant Program, Univ. N. Carolina, 58–66. Google Scholar Scheltema, R. S., 1977. Dispersal of marine invertebrate organisms: Paleobiogeographic and biostratigraphic implications, in E. G. Kauffman and J. E. Hazel, eds., Concepts and Methods in Biostratigraphy. Stroudsburg, Pa.: Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross, 73–108. Google Scholar Shuto, T., 1974. Larval ecology of prosobranch gastropods and its bearing on biogeography and paleontology. Lethaia, 7, 239–256. Google Scholar Thorson, G., 1946. Reproduction and larval development of Danish marine bottom invertebrates. Medd. Komm. Dan. Fisk., Havundersog. Copenhagen, Series Plankton, 4, 1–523. Google Scholar Thorson, G., 1950. Reproduction and larval ecology of marine bottom invertebrates. Biol. Rev. Cambridge Phil. Soc., 25, 1–45. Google Scholar Thorson, G., 1961. Length of pelagic life in marine invertebrates as related to larval transport by ocean currents, in M. Sears, ed., Oceanography Washington, D.C.: Amer. Assoc. Adv. Sci., Pub. 67, 455–475. Google Scholar Turner, R. F., 1973. The paleoecologic and paleobiogeographic implications of the Maastrictian Cheilostomata (Bryozoa) of the Navesink Formation. Ph.D. Diss., Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J., 371p. Google Scholar Vermeij, G. J., 1978. Biogeography and Adaptation: Patterns of Marine Life. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press, 332p. Google Scholar Cross-references Bivalvia ; Paleobiogeography . Download references

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0050.010
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKluwer Academic Publishers eBooksSame topicMarine Biology and Environmental ChemistryFrench-language works237,207