MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1766886918

International perspectives on English language teacher education : innovations from the field

2015· book· en· W1766886918 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Thomas S. C. Farrell

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicSecond Language Learning and Teaching
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTeacher educationCognitive dissonancePedagogyLanguage educationMathematics educationSociologyProfessional developmentPsychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1. Second Language Teacher Education: A Reality Check Thomas S.C. Farrell 2. Constructivist Language Teacher Education: An Example from Turkey Simon Phipps 3. Encouraging Critical Reflection in a Teacher Education Course: A Canadian Case Study Thomas S.C. Farrell 4. Teaching Everything to No One and Nothing to Everyone: Addressing the Content in Content Based Instruction Margo DelliCarpini & Orlando B. Alonso 5. Dissonance and Balance: The Four Strands Framework and Pre-service Teacher Education John Macalister and Jill Musgrave 6. Materials Design in Language Teacher Education: A Example from Southeast Asia Jack C. Richards 7. Translanguaging Principles in L2 Reading Instruction: Implications for ESL Pre-service Teacher Program Leketi Makalela 8. Creative Enactments of Language Teacher Education Policy: A Singapore Case Study Lubna Alsagoff 9. Changing Practice and Enabling Development: The Impact of Technology on Teaching and Language Teacher Education in UAE Federal Institutions Helen Donaghue 10. Using Screen Capture Software to Improve the Value of Feedback on Academic Assignments in Teacher Education Steve Mann 11. Developing Novice EFL Teachers' Pedagogical Knowledge through Lesson Study Activities Hao Xu 12. Reflective Practice as Innovation in SLTE Thomas S.C. Farrell

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.236
Threshold uncertainty score0.953

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0480.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSecond Language Learning and TeachingFrench-language works237,207