Bibliographic record
Abstract
Si la question de l’identité peut servir de fil conducteur pour appréhender les démarches littéraires et artistiques d’agents afrodescendants en Europe, c’est qu’elle pose aussi les données du problème dans leur caractère enchevêtré ; en ce sens qu’elle implique une lecture qui, simplement, transcende le cadre du matériau traité, en l’occurrence, le corpus littéraire, pour viser directement le général. À partir de cette remarque, on peut décrire comment les cas singuliers illustrent ce caractère général à partir de leur spécificité. Plus concrètement, il s’agit d’étudier la peinture générale de l’identité afrodescendante en Europe à partir de l’exemple d’In Koli Jean Bofane et de Chéri Samba. Ces deux singularités permettent de questionner la posture des intellectuels de la diaspora afrodescendante en Europe, sa manière de se négocier une place dans l’ordre social et intellectuel, ce qui donne une indication sur la manière dont elle se pense et se détermine, à défaut de se définir.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".