Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Gender bias has been explored extensively in the treatment of cardiovascular disease (CVD), particularly acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Previous research is inconsistent in suggesting that women who suffer an AMI are treated less optimally than men. To date, gender bias has not been well addressed in other CVDs, specifically cerebrovascular accident (CVA), coronary revascularization, or chronic kidney disease (CKD). In an attempt to get a clearer grasp of the problem, community acquired pneumonia (CAP) was also studied and served as a non-vascular disease control. -- Methods: Using trained research nurses, retrospective chart reviews were completed for all patients admitted with AMI, CVA, for coronary revascularization, or CAP in 1995/6, 1998/9, and 2000/1 in two locations of Newfoundland (St. John's and Central Newfoundland). CKD care was analyzed using data from the STARRT (Study To Assess Renal Replacement Therapy) study, a Canadian multicentre retrospective chart review of incident dialysis patients followed for six months. All results were divided into three categories - access, intervention, and outcome - and, after controlling for baseline demographics, were explored for differences in care between men and women. -- Results: Women were often older than men and suffered from more co-morbidities and more severe medical histories, except for CAP where men were more likely to have co-morbid illnesses. Women who had suffered an AMI had a significantly longer time to thrombolytics (70 vs. 45 mins., p=0.02) and were less likely to be admitted to the CCU (84% vs. 91%, p=0.02). Women with severe CAD were more likely to receive medical management (42% vs. 28%, p=0.005) and, of the women who did receive CABG, had longer wait times in one priority for CABG group (8.0 vs. 6.0 days, p=0.05). Women began dialysis with a lower eGFR level (8.6 vs. 10.1 mL/mins., p=0.006) after receiving less pre-dialysis care than men (>1 mth. vs. <1 mth.) (80% vs. 88%, p=0.05). There was no evidence of a gender bias against women in CVA patients, in fact women were more likely to be seen by a social worker than men (43% vs. 34%, p=0.01). Of the patients receiving treatment for CAP, women were less likely than men to receive the appropriate antibiotics (AB) when considering the 1993 guidelines for AB treatment (70% vs. 78%, p=0.03). While women received less optimal access and interventions, the proportion of death between men and women for all CVDs analyzed were similar. -- Conclusions: Women are not treated with the same quality of care as men with regards to access and intervention for AMI's, coronary revascularization, and CKD. This bias was also found in a nonvascular control group. A potential gender bias in the treatment of these patients needs to be explored further.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.031 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".