MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1769946178 · doi:10.1109/iscas.2006.1692821

A 0.8V Algorithmically Defined Buffer and Ring Oscillator Low-Energy Design for Nanometer SoCs

2006· article· en· W1769946178 on OpenAlexaff
Bill Pontikakis, Francois-R. Boyer, Yvon Savaria

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLow-power high-performance VLSI design
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRing oscillatorBuffer (optical fiber)NanometreComputer scienceRing (chemistry)Embedded systemElectrical engineeringTelecommunicationsPhysicsEngineeringCMOS

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, an algorithmically defined buffer and ring oscillator design for low energy applications is proposed. The goal of the algorithm is to easily converge to a low energy solution while the system maintains constant speed and full swing at a given supply voltage, irrespective of the capacitive load. The experimental circuit is a 980MHz oscillator operating from a 0.8V supply, driving a 1pF load, designed using a 0.18mum TSMC CMOS process technology. A comparison to the well known minimum delay tapered buffer, using an exponential horn designed independently of the oscillator, is done. The comparison shows that our algorithm produces a 3.7-3.9 times improvement in terms of power, energy, and energy delay product (EDP) metrics, and 14.6 times improvement in terms of the energy area product (EAP)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.688
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.174
Teacher spread0.167 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLow-power high-performance VLSI designFrench-language works237,207