MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1770370153 · doi:10.24908/pceea.v0i0.3892

A COURSE IN MECHATRONICS AND CALLING THE BLUFF ON ACTIVE LEARNING

2011· article· en· W1770370153 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMechatronics Education and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of VictoriaQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnthusiasmMechatronicsCourse (navigation)BluffMultidisciplinary approachSubject (documents)Mathematics educationEngineeringActive learning (machine learning)Computer scienceEngineering managementPsychologyArtificial intelligenceSociologyLibrary scienceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

When one talks about the elements needed for the next generation of engineering students, a list of the keywords typically includes the following: active learning, integrated learning, just in time instruction, theory versus practise, written and oral communication, multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary teams, lectures, tutorials, laboratories, workshops and design projects. An elective course in mechatronics engineering at Queen’s University is put forward as an example of how one course can encompass all of these elements, and equally important, be able to promote the excitement and enthusiasm among the students for the subject in a manner that should be present in all engineering courses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.807
Threshold uncertainty score0.437

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it