MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1770761605 · doi:10.3109/15563650.2015.1066507

External validation of the paracetamol-aminotransferase multiplication product to predict hepatotoxicity from paracetamol overdose

2015· article· en· W1770761605 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Toxicology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicDrug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAcetaminophenMedicineDrug overdosePharmacologyEmergency medicineAnesthesiaPoison control

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CONTEXT: Risk prediction in paracetamol (acetaminophen, or APAP) poisoning treated with acetylcysteine helps guide initial patient management and disposition. The paracetamol-aminotransferase multiplication product may be a useful and less time-sensitive risk predictor. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to validate this multiplication product in an independent cohort of patients with paracetamol overdose. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using an existing toxicology dataset of poisoned patients from two large inner-city United Kingdom teaching hospitals, we retrospectively identified by electronic search all paracetamol overdoses from February 2005 to March 2013. We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of the multiplication product (serum APAP concentration × alanine transaminase [ALT] activity), especially at the pre-specified cut-off points of 1 500 mg/L × IU/L (10 000 micromol/L × IU/L) and 10 000 mg/L × IU/L (66 000 micromol/L × IU/L). The primary outcome was hepatotoxicity defined by a peak ALT > 1000 IU/L. RESULTS: Of 3823 total paracetamol overdose presentations, there were 2743 acute single, 452 delayed single (> 24 h post overdose), 426 staggered (ingestion over > 1 h), and 202 supratherapeutic ingestions. Altogether, 34 patients developed hepatotoxicity. Among the acute single-ingestion patients, a multiplication product > 10 000 mg/L × IU/L had a sensitivity of 80% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 44%, 96%) and specificity of 99.6% [99.3%, 99.8%], while a product > 1 500 mg/L × IU/L had a sensitivity of 100% [66%, 100%] and specificity of 92% [91%, 93%]. Overall, 16 patients with a multiplication product > 10 000 mg/L × IU/L developed hepatotoxicity (likelihood ratio: 250, 95% CI: 130, 480), and 4 patients with a multiplication product between 1 500 and 10 000 (likelihood ratio: 2.5, 95% CI: 1.0, 6.0). No patient with a product < 1 500 mg/L × IU/L who received acetylcysteine developed hepatotoxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of ingestion type, a product > 10 000 mg/L × IU/L was associated with a very high likelihood, and < 1 500 mg/L × IU/L with a very low likelihood, of developing hepatotoxicity in patients treated with acetylcysteine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.403
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.306
GPT teacher head0.485
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it