Pentraxin-3 concentrations in stable coronary artery disease depend on the clinical presentation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Pentraxin-3 (PTX3) is an acute-phase reactant that shares structural and functional homology with C-reactive protein (CRP). However, unlike CRP, which is synthesized mainly in the liver, PTX3 is produced at the site of inflammation. It has been suggested that PTX3 plays the same role in the periphery that CRP does in circulation. PTX3 may represent a rapid marker of local inflammation. METHODS: Fifty-one patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) were enrolled. Blood samples were collected on admission. Plasma concentration of PTX3 and high-sensitivity CRP (hsCRP) were determined. RESULTS: Median PTX3 concentration was 0.92 μmol/L (0.58-1.40). Median hsCRP concentration was 0.90 mg/L (0.75-1.10). There was a positive correlation between PTX3 and total cholesterol (R=0.34; P=0.01), PTX3 and LDL cholesterol (R=0.35; P=0.01), and PTX3 and hsCRP (R=0.46; P = 0.0005). We found no correlation between hsCRP and all laboratory parameters. We found higher PTX3 concentrations in patients with Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) functional class 3 (compared to CCS functional class 2) and in patients taking nitrates. Lower PTX3 concentrations were reported in patients taking calcium channel blockers (amlodipine). hsCRP concentrations remained similar among these subgroups of patients. CONCLUSIONS: PTX3 is a marker of clinically more advanced CAD (CCS2 vs CCS3; nitrates vs no nitrates). PTX3 is also associated with other cardiovascular risk factors (total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and hsCRP). PTX3 may be a potential early marker of cardiovascular risk before the increase of systemic markers like hsCRP.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".