MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1772612133

Strafregtelike struikelblokke in die mishandelde persoon se stryd om geregtigheid : regte

2014· article· af· W1772612133 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rinda Botha

Bibliographic record

VenueLitnet Akademies : 'n Joernaal vir die Geesteswetenskappe, Natuurwetenskappe, Regte en Godsdienswetenskappe · 2014
Typearticle
Languageaf
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal Issues in South Africa
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTheologyDie (integrated circuit)ArtPhilosophyEngineeringMechanical engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mishandeling in die intieme binnekring van die huis, met veral kinders en vroue as slagoffers, is 'n onaangename werklikheid. Die ironie dat slagoffers van hierdie tipe geweld dikwels eie reg gebruik om hulself te beskerm, en uiteindelik in strafverrigtinge in die beskuldigdebank beland, skrei ten hemele. Die meeste van hierdie slagoffers word dan ook aan moord skuldig bevind. Die algemeenste verwere wat sulke opper, is noodweer en nie-patologiese ontoerekeningsvatbaarheid. Tog slaag weinig met hierdie verwere, en het die beperktheid en ontoereikendheid daarvan regskundiges al laat opmerk dat die howe verplig is om die reels te ontwikkel en met die Grondwet te versoen. Hierdie artikel probeer om die weg vir sodanige verdere ontwikkeling te baan deur te let op die struikelblokke wat mishandelde persone dikwels as beskuldigdes in die soeke na geregtigheid ondervind, met bepaalde klem op voormelde twee beperkte verwere. Die struikelblokke vir 'n suksesvolle beroep op noodweer is die vereiste van onmiddellike bedreiging van die beskuldigde, en die noodsaaklikheid van die afweerhandeling. Die verweer van nie-patologiese ontoerekeningsvatbaarheid is ewe beperk, veral ook omdat die voortbestaan van die verweer sedert S v Eadie 2002 1 SASV 663 (HHA) in die weegskaal is. Na 'n kort vergelyking tussen die Suid-Afrikaanse en Kanadese standpunte is die gevolgtrekking dat Suid-Afrika heelwat by die Kanadese regstelsel kan leer oor die hantering van die beskuldigde: die Kanadese hoogste hof van appel het byvoorbeeld die vereiste van onmiddellike bedreiging aansienlik uitgebrei om ook voorsiening te maak vir die mishandelde persoon wat reeds voor die aanvang van 'n volgende aanval teen die mishandelaar optree. Die vereiste van redelike gedrag bly staan, maar word beskou in die lig van die mishandelde se unieke omstandighede. Ook wat nie-patologiese ontoerekeningsvatbaarheid betref, kan 'n soortgelyke benadering as die Kanadese s'n - naamlik die gebruik van 'n gemengde toets van toerekeningsvatbaarheid wat uit objektiewe en subjektiewe elemente bestaan - die mishandelde persoon se stryd om geregtigheid in Suid-Afrika beduidend vergemaklik. Abuse in the intimate inner circle of the home, with mostly children and women as the victims, is an unpleasant reality. Recent news reports about a father on the East Rand who allegedly held captive, assaulted and tortured his five children between the ages of two and 16 from birth have sent shock waves through the country. The World Health Report reveals that approximately one third of all women worldwide are victims of some or other form of domestic violence, while it has also been reported that women are more often assaulted or killed by their intimate partners than by anyone else. The terrible irony is that victims of this type of violence often have little choice but to take the law into their own hands to protect themselves, and end up as the in criminal proceedings. To add insult to injury, most of these victims are convicted of murder. The most common defences raised by these accused are self-defence and non-pathological criminal incapacity. In South Africa, however, few succeed on these grounds. The severe limitations and inadequacy of these defences have in fact led jurists to note that the courts are obligated to develop these rules and align them with the South African Constitution, which enshrines everyone's right to have their dignity respected and protected, the right to freedom and security of the person, the right to bodily and psychological integrity, the right not to be subjected to torture in any way, as well as not to be treated or punished in a cruel, inhuman or degrading way. This article attempts to pave the way for such further development by identifying the obstacles often experienced by abused persons in search of justice, with a particular focus on the aforementioned two limited defences, and offering some suggestions as to the possible improved handling of these cases, drawing on the Canadian example.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.160

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.007
Scholarly communication0.0100.008
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0480.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLitnet Akademies : 'n Joernaal vir die Geesteswetenskappe, Natuurwetenskappe, Regte en GodsdienswetenskappeSame topicLegal Issues in South AfricaFrench-language works237,207