MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1772948029 · doi:10.24908/pceea.v0i0.4685

ENHANCING THE ENGINEERING CURRICULUM THROUGH HOLISTIC ENGINEERING

2012· article· en· W1772948029 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Janelle MacDougall, A. A. G. Ham, Remon Pop‐Iliev

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA) · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSustainability in Higher Education
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Ontario Institute of Technology
KeywordsCurriculumEngineering ethicsSustainabilityEngineering educationProcess (computing)EngineeringGlobalizationHealth systems engineeringEngineering design processEngineering managementPsychologyPolitical scienceComputer sciencePedagogyMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The idea of a holistic approach to engineering design and education has been envisioned as a means to meet the perceived and emerging needs for innovation in the 21st century. Many engineering educators, practicing engineers and engineering students have already recognized the gaps and areas of potential improvements in the knowledge acquisition process implemented in current engineering degree programs when compared to current societal and technological issues and developments. We have explored opportunities to integrate practical communication and professional engineering experience through topics such as:sustainability, globalization, public policy, innovative design, health and safety, and ethical implications of emerging technologies into the current engineering curriculum. To achieve this, an experimental course was designed focusing on the aforementioned topics. Using real-life case studies to combine these themes, the course allows for group problem-solving exercises that would enhance the collaborative experience for students, and increase the appreciation for the profession of engineering. The results of the effectiveness of the holistic approach and case-based learning are discussed and respective recommendations are being made upon thefindings. This paper also provides insight as to how educators can incorporate these themes into the preexisting classes at university or into a stand alone course.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2012
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)Same topicSustainability in Higher EducationFrench-language works237,207