Expressive Arts Therapy for Traumatized Children and Adolescents: A Four-Phase Model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Foreword William Steele Preface Introduction I. The Expressive Arts Therapy Way 1. Expressive Arts Therapy 2. The Action of Expressive Arts Therapy II. Trauma and Expressive Arts Therapy 3. Children's Experience of Trauma 4. A Resource-Oriented Lens III. An Expressive Arts Four-Phase Model of Treatment 5. Introudction to the Expressive Arts Four-Phase Model 6. Phase One Assessment Guidelines: Understanding the Child's World 7. Phase Two Guideliens: Cultivating Safety and Resources 8. Phase Three Guidelines: Trauma Processing 9. Phase Four Guidelines: Reclaim, Reframe, Repair, and Reorient Appendix A. An Expressive Arts Four Phase Model: Checklist of the Main Map B. Therapist Handouts for Organizing Assessment and Treatment Information C. Information Handouts for Clients D. Phase One: Arts-Based Information Gathering Tools E. Phase One: Questionnaires F. Phase Two: Cultivating Safety and Resources G. Phase Three: Trauma Processing H. Phase Four: Reclaim, Reframe, Repair, and Reorient I. Questions J. Further Resources
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".