MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1773196161 · doi:10.1115/1.4031485

Interaction-Induced Morphological Transitions of Lipid Membranes in Contact With an Elliptical Cross Section of a Rigid Substrate

2015· article· en· W1773196161 on OpenAlexaff
Tsegay Belay, C. I. Kim, Peter Schiavone

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Mechanics · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicLipid Membrane Structure and Behavior
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMembraneCurvilinear coordinatesCylinderBoundary value problemRepresentation (politics)Deformation (meteorology)Domain (mathematical analysis)Contact angleBoundary (topology)Mathieu functionGeometryPhysicsClassical mechanicsMaterials scienceMechanicsMathematical analysisChemistryMathematicsThermodynamicsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a complete analysis for the deformation profiles of lipid membranes induced by their interactions with solid elliptical cylinder substrates (e.g., proteins). The theoretical framework for the mechanics of lipid membranes is described in terms of the classical Helfrich model, and the resulting shape equation is formulated in general curvilinear coordinates to accommodate the elliptical shape of the contour surrounding the contact area. Admissible boundary conditions for the contact region are taken from the existing literature but reformulated and adapted to the current framework. A complete semi-analytic solution (in terms of Mathieu functions) is obtained within the limitation of superposed incremental deformations and the Monge representation in the deformed configuration functions. The results predict smooth morphological transitions over the domain of interest when a lipid membrane interacts with a rigid substrate through an elliptical contact region.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.370

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied MechanicsSame topicLipid Membrane Structure and BehaviorFrench-language works237,207