MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1773572804

'n Analise van die representasie van geslagtelikheid in Roelf van Rensburg se Gooi hom in die sloot (1971) en Barrie Hough se Skilpoppe (1998) : opvoedkundige implikasies

2001· dissertation· af· W1773572804 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
M.M. Nieman

Bibliographic record

VenueResearchSpace (University of KwaZulu-Natal) · 2001
Typedissertation
Languageaf
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicSyntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDie (integrated circuit)PhilosophyTheologyEngineeringMechanical engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

IV 2.5 GESLAGSROLSTEREOTIPERING 26 2.6 DIE ROL VAN TAAL IN DIE UITBEELDING VAN GESLAGTELlKHEID 29 2.6.1 Ideologie 29 2.6.2Die oordra van kultuur deur middel van taal 31 2.6.3Seksistiese taalgebruik 32 2.6.3.1 Die generiese vorm 32 2.6.3.2Verhewe betekenistoekenning aan die manlike rol en manlikheid 33 2.6.3.3Diskriminerende en neerhalende uitdrukkings 34 2.6.3.4Verwysings na vrouens as in 'n verhouding met 'n man 35 2.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.071
Threshold uncertainty score0.141

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.007
Scholarly communication0.0080.009
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueResearchSpace (University of KwaZulu-Natal)Same topicSyntax, Semantics, Linguistic VariationFrench-language works237,207