MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1773643494 · doi:10.1109/imtc.2001.928820

Photogrammetric calibration of a mobile robot model

2002· article· en· W1773643494 on OpenAlexaff
Louis P McNamee, E.M. Petrin, H.J.W. Spoelder

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicOptical measurement and interference techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKinematicsComputer visionRobot calibrationPhotogrammetryKalman filterMobile robotArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceRobotCalibrationRobot kinematicsExtended Kalman filterCamera resectioningMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A nonintrusive methodology to calibrate kinematic models for wheeled mobile robots is proposed The calibration process begins with photogrammetric measurement of robot trajectories for known control inputs. Measurement is achieved with a low cost CCD camera. The camera is calibrated using a modified form of Tsai's direct linear transform based algorithm. The robot kinematic state is determined from a sequence of video data using a modified version of Lowe's pose recovery algorithm. A derivative free form of the extended Kalman filter is used to estimate parameters for a known model from the time series kinematic data. Experimental results are presented for differential wheeled mobile robot configuration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.870
Threshold uncertainty score0.169

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOptical measurement and interference techniquesFrench-language works237,207