MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1773775527 · doi:10.2136/sssaj2000.6451563x

Measuring Hydraulic Properties Using a Line Source II. Field Test

2000· article· en· W1773775527 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Z. Fred Zhang, R. G. Kachanoski, Gary W. Parkin, Bingcheng Si

Bibliographic record

VenueSoil Science Society of America Journal · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil Moisture and Remote Sensing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of GuelphUniversity of SaskatchewanMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaOntario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural AffairsUniversity of Guelph
KeywordsPermeameterInfiltrometerHydraulic conductivityInfiltration (HVAC)ReflectometrySoil scienceLine sourceTRACERSaturation (graph theory)Pressure headEnvironmental scienceVadose zoneHydrology (agriculture)Hydraulic headSoil waterGeologyMaterials scienceGeotechnical engineeringTime domainOpticsMathematicsPhysicsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We designed and tested a field method to measure unsaturated soil hydraulic properties using multi‐purpose time domain reflectometry (TDR) probes below a surface line source with constant flux of water. The surface line source was produced with a moving irrigation system at a field site sheltered from precipitation. Two hundred multi‐purpose TDR probes were vertically installed in the soil beneath the line source to measure soil water pressure head (ψ), water storage ( W ), and tracer travel time ( T ). The soil hydraulic properties, the inverse macroscopic capillary length (α), hydraulic conductivity at saturation ( K s ), and soil water content at saturation (θ s ) were estimated by inverse procedures with new analytical expressions. Five combinations of measurement sets, namely W ‐only, ψ and W , ψ and T , and W and T , and ψ and W and T were used. Approximate confidence contours in the α– K s plane were calculated to show the precision of the parameter estimates. For comparison, hydraulic properties were also measured by means of the Guelph Permeameter (GP) and the modified Guelph Pressure Infiltrometer (GPI) systems. Hydraulic parameters estimated from only W measurements were similar to those estimated from the combinations of W and ψ, or W and T , or W and ψ and T The estimated hydraulic parameters were similar to those obtained with three‐dimensional (3‐D) infiltration measurements by means of the GP and GPI systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2000
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSoil Science Society of America JournalSame topicSoil Moisture and Remote SensingFrench-language works237,207