Bibliographic record
Abstract
Happy New Year to all and I hope you are looking forward to another exciting year for the International Journal of Mental Health Nursing as I am. I am very excited to introduce the new structure and of course the new members of the Editorial Board for the IJMHN. The call for Expressions of Interest was met with a large number of enquiries and applications. The fact that so many of these were from outside Australia demonstrates the place the journal new holds within the international community of mental health nurses, while still retaining a strong interest within Australia. It was the source of both pleasure and anguish that the number of EOIs received far outnumbered the positions available. The pleasure reflects the popularity of the IJMHN within professional and scholarly communities and the willingness of the journal's readership to become actively involved in the future of the journal. The anguish comes from not being able to convert all of that interest into positions on the Board. To those applicants who were not already reviewers, I have extended an invitation to contribute to the journal in this important capacity and many have already accepted. The ongoing success of the IJMHN depends in no small part on the availability and willingness of reviewers to provide valuable feedback as part of the peer review process. The Board now has three Associate Editors from Asia, the United Kingdom and United States. Their role will be specifically aimed at increasing the penetration of the journal in these areas, securing reviewers, soliciting papers and increasing subscriptions. These positions will be supported by an Editorial Board of an additional 20 members, including nine from Australia and 11 from overseas. The international contingent represents eight countries including England, Ireland, Canada, New Zealand, Hong Kong, Norway, Thailand and Sweden. The new members of the Board, many highly experienced with Editorial Boards of other journals, will be well supported by those who have been in the role for a number of years. Trish Martin and I are very excited about working with this new team. The expertise and enthusiasm of members will be vitally important as submissions continue to grow particularly from outside of Australia. Many new members have already contacted us with ideas. Their enthusiasm and willingness to be an active part of this role is fantastic and I can't wait to work with you all together as a large team with so much talent in mental health nursing, research, publication and commitment to the larger selection. It is a privilege to be the Editor-in-Chief at this important time in the Journal's development. Other exciting developments for the journal include the introduction of Manuscript Central. Some of you may have used this system before to submit articles. It provides the opportunity for you to map the stage for the production process where your article is at any one time. This will be a really important development that in time can completely change the way the work of the journal is conducted. The internet based service can be accessed from all over the world, which means it won't be difficult to stay on top of the work load. This will enable us to even further decrease the time from submission of the manuscript until the first response is received by the authors. The move from four to six issues in 2007 has given me plenty to do in my spare time but has substantially reduced the time delay between acceptance of the article and publication, from about 12–15 months, to about 4–6 months. This ensures that the content of the journal is relevant and up to date. It also keeps authors happy. When their work goes into print in a timely fashion they are much more likely to submit further work. With the input and assistance of the new Editorial Board, 2008 should prove to be another exciting year, full of knowledge, ideas, debate and controversy that are so necessary as part of the mental health nursing agenda. In closing I would like to thank the retiring members of former Editorial Board for their contribution to the journal and wish them all the very best with their future endeavours.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.025 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.018 | 0.012 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.013 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.011 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.540 | 0.547 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".