Retirer à Pierrette pour donner à Alexandre ! Le développement de la formation générale des adultes au Québec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article vise à mieux comprendre, sur le plan historique, le développement de l’éducation des adultes au Québec. Nous examinons un segment spécifique de l’éducation des adultes, la formation générale des adultes, qui est un dispositif éducatif spécifique de l’enseignement secondaire créé dans la foulée de la Révolution tranquille afin de favoriser les retours aux études des adultes, et de relever le niveau de qualification de base de la population adulte. Notre analyse est guidée par une question précise : sommes-nous devant une substitution de la mission éducative, au cours des dernières années, de la formation générale des adultes qui se consacrerait moins à l’éducation des adultes et davantage à la lutte contre le décrochage et à la diplomation des jeunes en difficulté dans les écoles secondaires ditesclassiques ?
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.023 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".