Influence of storage conditions on the sensory quality of a high acid apple
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary Studies involving sensory analysis and consumer acceptance have not been reported for high acid apples. The objectives of this work were to determine (i) the influence of storage condition on sensory quality and (ii) which instrumental attributes would influence good consumer acceptability of a high acid apple, ‘Reinette du Canada’. Textural descriptors including firmness, crispness and juiciness and acidity decreased during storage irrespective of the storage condition, with fruit stored in cold storage (CS) having lower sensory scores than fruit stored in controlled atmospheres (CA). Consumer acceptance decreased significantly during storage, although loss of quality in the CS fruit was significantly greater than in the CA‐stored fruit. It must be emphasised that titratable acidity (TA) played a positive role in consumer acceptability. As hue, firmness and TA were the instrumental properties that best correlated with consumer acceptance, these instrumental properties would be useful for predicting during long‐term storage, the consumer acceptability of a high acid apple such as ‘Reinette du Canada’.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".